Proof that eta(n)>2: case n coprime with 3

Suppose n>26 is coprime with 6. Then every potential typical primality radius of n is a multiple of 6. But as 84=6\times 14 is a multiple of 7 less than 210, and 90=6\times 15 is a multiple of 5 less than 210, it follows that 84 and 90 can’t be potential typical primality radii of n since each of them shares with n a residue class mod p for p\in\{5,7\}.
Hence \eta(n)>2 (since one has at least 3 different Goldbach gaps, namely of size 6, 12 or 18).

The same reasoning can be applied for n>26 even and coprime with 3 by replacing 84 with 189 and 90 with 195.

Publicité

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s